Stop cuts to working parents' time to care

UPDATE - GREAT NEWS: After two years of powerful campaigning by Fair Agenda members and other concerned community members, the cuts to paid parental leave have been taken out of the federal budget. It's a really important reprieve for the tens of thousands of working families who stood to lose precious time to care if these cuts had gone ahead.

But - the fight may not be over. If the Government have shown us anything over the past two years, it's that they don't give up on these cuts easily -- so Fair Agenda will keep a watching brief on this issue.

But right now, Fair Agenda's work to secure an election commitment from the Nick Xenophon Team - and to hold them to account for that promise - are the key factor that are stopping these cuts going ahead. So thank you to all those Fair Agenda members who made calls, sent emails, met with their Senators, helped secure election commitments, and funded research to help stop these cuts. You can read more about the impact of our campaigning together here.

---

The Turnbull Government have just announced their *fourth* attempt to cut our paid parental leave system. They're trying to sell this new proposal as a boost for parents; but in reality they're making a boost for some parents entirely contingent on cutting the time tens of thousands of other working parents can afford to spend caring for their newborns, and planning on stripping $750 million from the system overall.

It's a proposal that would pit working parents against each other, and drag our system backwards. It would also cap the total combined leave available to eligible parents at 20 weeks -- well below the 26 weeks postnatal leave experts recommend for health and welfare outcomes.

The fate of these cuts will be decided by the Senate crossbench, with The Nick Xenophon Team expected to have the critical casting votes. Community campaigning has stopped the Turnbull Government from getting their plans to cut paid parental leave through the previous parliament. 

It's critical we show the Senate crossbench that the community oppose these cuts; and want them to stop these cruel cuts to new families. Can you sign the petition to join the campaign?

Find out more about the new cuts

Experts say that 26 weeks post-natal leave is the minimum needed for health and welfare reasons.

Right now, any eligible parent can access 18 weeks of leave at the minimum wage, and then top that up with any leave they’ve negotiated into their employment contract, to cover costs while they care for their newborn.

The system was designed to be used in combination; to allow more women to access the recommended 26+ weeks leave. For many women, the leave negotiated into their employment agreement has been bargained in lieu of additional pay or other leave provisions. 

In their latest proposal the Government is once again trying to punish these women – by cutting their access to government leave if they want to access the employer leave they’ve negotiated. It means that instead of acting as a floor, the period of government provided leave would instead becomes a ceiling.

To be clear, there are some positive aspects of this latest proposal:

  • The amount of government provided leave would be increased from 18 to 20 weeks at the minimum wage (still well below the 26 weeks recommended by experts). This would be good news for working parents without access to employer leave.
  • A change in the ‘activity test’ that determines would also see an increase in the number of parents eligible to access parental leave. And if these increases were all that was on the table – it would be good news...
  • But both these changes would both be contingent on cutting the leave available for 72,000 other families.  

In short, the crux of this proposal is still a cut. One that’s estimated to tear $600-$750 million out of the parental leave system, and to slash the amount of time thousands of workers like nurses, retail workers and ambos can afford to spend caring for their newborn. In fact, it’s estimated that under this new proposal 68,000 families with a median income of $62,000 a year would lose an average of $5,600.[2]

 

-Find out more -

1. Is this the winning compromise on paid parental leave, Women’s Agenda, 21 November 2016.

2. Samantha Maiden: Breakthrough looms on parental leave pay, Daily Telegraph, 20 November 2016.

Paid parental leave: Nick Xenophon warned not to pit working mums against each other, Sydney Morning Herald, 20 November 2016. 

29,038 SIGNATURES

It's hard enough caring for a newborn without being forced back to work early. Please don't cut working parents' right to the existing 18 weeks government paid parental leave. 

Signed,

Fair Agenda will email petition signers from time to time with important updates

* required fields

Latest activity

Amy , 2650  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:11:24 +1000
"I believe it is important to support working women to raise their families in order to reduce the amount of non-working mothers relying solely on government benefits to help them do this. We are already breeding a growing generation of welfare-reliant Australians who know nothing other than collecting benefits and not working, is this really the way they would like our country to continue?"
jacinta , 6112  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:10:11 +1000
Karissa , 2780  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:09:56 +1000
Jenny , 6743  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:09:54 +1000
Rosa , 7000  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:09:53 +1000
"It is important that mothers and fathers can have time focused on their very young babies. The 18 weeks government parental leave is intended to supplement any employer 6 or 12 weeks paid leave where this is available. Also child care for babies is difficult to access and was, in my experience, unsatisfactory. If your government is fair dinkum about achieving greater equality for women, you will not roll back this hard won element of workforce equality. Double dipping!!!! What an insult!! As bad as ‘lifestyle choice’."
Marianne , 2049  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:09:47 +1000
"This is just another way the conservatives are hurting us all. They are only interested in helping the rich and big corporations. Why is it fair that new mothers are forced to go back to work to make ends meet when corporations get away without paying proper taxes?! Why is welfare being cut when corporations get away without paying proper taxes?! Why are things such as tampons and pads taxed, when corporations get away without paying proper taxes?!"
Kate , 4068  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:09:45 +1000
krystle , 2840  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:09:44 +1000
"I totally agree that mothers should not be allowed to “double dip”… but i feel that all women should be allowed a full 6 months paid leave after the baby is born- whether it be a change in workplace laws, a change in the scheme or both… i also think there shpuld be some sort of employment protection for women having children that are working on a casual basis…"
Virginie , 3165  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:09:19 +1000
Jen , 2541  /  signed 2015-05-12 10:09:04 +1000
"I’m a mum of 2, soon to be 3 beautiful babies and I want nothing more than to be able to stay home with them as much as possible, but thanks to the proposed changes I may be forced back to work even sooner! The government wants to stop “double dipping” between government and employer paid leave, well my work only offers 4 weeks paid leave, is that really double dipping? I call that pathetic! That 4 weeks covers me for the time I have off before bubs is due, that’s all. The government has lost sight of what’s important!"
← Previous  1  2  …  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  …  448  449  Next →