Stop cuts to working parents' time to care

UPDATE - GREAT NEWS: After two years of powerful campaigning by Fair Agenda members and other concerned community members, the cuts to paid parental leave have been taken out of the federal budget. It's a really important reprieve for the tens of thousands of working families who stood to lose precious time to care if these cuts had gone ahead.

But - the fight may not be over. If the Government have shown us anything over the past two years, it's that they don't give up on these cuts easily -- so Fair Agenda will keep a watching brief on this issue.

But right now, Fair Agenda's work to secure an election commitment from the Nick Xenophon Team - and to hold them to account for that promise - are the key factor that are stopping these cuts going ahead. So thank you to all those Fair Agenda members who made calls, sent emails, met with their Senators, helped secure election commitments, and funded research to help stop these cuts. You can read more about the impact of our campaigning together here.

---

The Turnbull Government have just announced their *fourth* attempt to cut our paid parental leave system. They're trying to sell this new proposal as a boost for parents; but in reality they're making a boost for some parents entirely contingent on cutting the time tens of thousands of other working parents can afford to spend caring for their newborns, and planning on stripping $750 million from the system overall.

It's a proposal that would pit working parents against each other, and drag our system backwards. It would also cap the total combined leave available to eligible parents at 20 weeks -- well below the 26 weeks postnatal leave experts recommend for health and welfare outcomes.

The fate of these cuts will be decided by the Senate crossbench, with The Nick Xenophon Team expected to have the critical casting votes. Community campaigning has stopped the Turnbull Government from getting their plans to cut paid parental leave through the previous parliament. 

It's critical we show the Senate crossbench that the community oppose these cuts; and want them to stop these cruel cuts to new families. Can you sign the petition to join the campaign?

Find out more about the new cuts

Experts say that 26 weeks post-natal leave is the minimum needed for health and welfare reasons.

Right now, any eligible parent can access 18 weeks of leave at the minimum wage, and then top that up with any leave they’ve negotiated into their employment contract, to cover costs while they care for their newborn.

The system was designed to be used in combination; to allow more women to access the recommended 26+ weeks leave. For many women, the leave negotiated into their employment agreement has been bargained in lieu of additional pay or other leave provisions. 

In their latest proposal the Government is once again trying to punish these women – by cutting their access to government leave if they want to access the employer leave they’ve negotiated. It means that instead of acting as a floor, the period of government provided leave would instead becomes a ceiling.

To be clear, there are some positive aspects of this latest proposal:

  • The amount of government provided leave would be increased from 18 to 20 weeks at the minimum wage (still well below the 26 weeks recommended by experts). This would be good news for working parents without access to employer leave.
  • A change in the ‘activity test’ that determines would also see an increase in the number of parents eligible to access parental leave. And if these increases were all that was on the table – it would be good news...
  • But both these changes would both be contingent on cutting the leave available for 72,000 other families.  

In short, the crux of this proposal is still a cut. One that’s estimated to tear $600-$750 million out of the parental leave system, and to slash the amount of time thousands of workers like nurses, retail workers and ambos can afford to spend caring for their newborn. In fact, it’s estimated that under this new proposal 68,000 families with a median income of $62,000 a year would lose an average of $5,600.[2]

 

-Find out more -

1. Is this the winning compromise on paid parental leave, Women’s Agenda, 21 November 2016.

2. Samantha Maiden: Breakthrough looms on parental leave pay, Daily Telegraph, 20 November 2016.

Paid parental leave: Nick Xenophon warned not to pit working mums against each other, Sydney Morning Herald, 20 November 2016. 

29,038 SIGNATURES

It's hard enough caring for a newborn without being forced back to work early. Please don't cut working parents' right to the existing 18 weeks government paid parental leave. 

Signed,

Fair Agenda will email petition signers from time to time with important updates

* required fields

Latest activity

Nick , 4157  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:26:10 +1000
"The cost of living is far too high these days, and this proposed policy is not only detrimental to the majority of Australian families, but will have negative implications on trying to reverse Australia’s ageing population!"
Carolyn , 4680  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:26:07 +1000
"I am astounded to once again see the government focus on who they can strip of any financial support instead of focusing more on ‘the top end of town’s $B companies who pay minimal taxes’.
Please sign this petition and allow all Australian mother’s at least a minimum of 18 weeks support to care for their newborn babies!"
Belinda , 2203  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:26:05 +1000
"As Marian Baird says: women aren’t double dipping, they’ve been double crossed! The govt has backed down on the promised 26 week publicly funded PPL scheme, and is now proposing to discourage employers from supplementing the existing miserly scheme."
Philippa , 2533  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:25:41 +1000
"Not only is this a broken promise and complete back flip made without apology, but it is a retrograde step that can only have a negative effect new families. Recognising the benefit of enabling working mothers to stay at home with their newborns, the Productivity Commission recommended that mothers who work be allowed to combine both the workplace and government schemes. To suggest women seeking to do so, who in fact are taxed on employer paid maternity leave, are ‘double dipping’ is unjustified and insulting."
Claudia , 2020  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:25:41 +1000
Warren , 6432  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:25:17 +1000
julie , 3058  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:25:16 +1000
Jae , 5605  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:25:08 +1000
"Couples may not be able to afford to have children if maternity leave is cut. Disgusting to think that government could make it unfair and disadvantage people planning families."
Jacintha , 2480  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:25:02 +1000
Brione , 2519  /  signed 2015-05-11 14:24:39 +1000
← Previous  1  2    317  318  319  320  321  322  323  324  325    448  449  Next →