Stop cuts to working parents' time to care

UPDATE - GREAT NEWS: After two years of powerful campaigning by Fair Agenda members and other concerned community members, the cuts to paid parental leave have been taken out of the federal budget. It's a really important reprieve for the tens of thousands of working families who stood to lose precious time to care if these cuts had gone ahead.

But - the fight may not be over. If the Government have shown us anything over the past two years, it's that they don't give up on these cuts easily -- so Fair Agenda will keep a watching brief on this issue.

But right now, Fair Agenda's work to secure an election commitment from the Nick Xenophon Team - and to hold them to account for that promise - are the key factor that are stopping these cuts going ahead. So thank you to all those Fair Agenda members who made calls, sent emails, met with their Senators, helped secure election commitments, and funded research to help stop these cuts. You can read more about the impact of our campaigning together here.

---

The Turnbull Government have just announced their *fourth* attempt to cut our paid parental leave system. They're trying to sell this new proposal as a boost for parents; but in reality they're making a boost for some parents entirely contingent on cutting the time tens of thousands of other working parents can afford to spend caring for their newborns, and planning on stripping $750 million from the system overall.

It's a proposal that would pit working parents against each other, and drag our system backwards. It would also cap the total combined leave available to eligible parents at 20 weeks -- well below the 26 weeks postnatal leave experts recommend for health and welfare outcomes.

The fate of these cuts will be decided by the Senate crossbench, with The Nick Xenophon Team expected to have the critical casting votes. Community campaigning has stopped the Turnbull Government from getting their plans to cut paid parental leave through the previous parliament. 

It's critical we show the Senate crossbench that the community oppose these cuts; and want them to stop these cruel cuts to new families. Can you sign the petition to join the campaign?

Find out more about the new cuts

Experts say that 26 weeks post-natal leave is the minimum needed for health and welfare reasons.

Right now, any eligible parent can access 18 weeks of leave at the minimum wage, and then top that up with any leave they’ve negotiated into their employment contract, to cover costs while they care for their newborn.

The system was designed to be used in combination; to allow more women to access the recommended 26+ weeks leave. For many women, the leave negotiated into their employment agreement has been bargained in lieu of additional pay or other leave provisions. 

In their latest proposal the Government is once again trying to punish these women – by cutting their access to government leave if they want to access the employer leave they’ve negotiated. It means that instead of acting as a floor, the period of government provided leave would instead becomes a ceiling.

To be clear, there are some positive aspects of this latest proposal:

  • The amount of government provided leave would be increased from 18 to 20 weeks at the minimum wage (still well below the 26 weeks recommended by experts). This would be good news for working parents without access to employer leave.
  • A change in the ‘activity test’ that determines would also see an increase in the number of parents eligible to access parental leave. And if these increases were all that was on the table – it would be good news...
  • But both these changes would both be contingent on cutting the leave available for 72,000 other families.  

In short, the crux of this proposal is still a cut. One that’s estimated to tear $600-$750 million out of the parental leave system, and to slash the amount of time thousands of workers like nurses, retail workers and ambos can afford to spend caring for their newborn. In fact, it’s estimated that under this new proposal 68,000 families with a median income of $62,000 a year would lose an average of $5,600.[2]

 

-Find out more -

1. Is this the winning compromise on paid parental leave, Women’s Agenda, 21 November 2016.

2. Samantha Maiden: Breakthrough looms on parental leave pay, Daily Telegraph, 20 November 2016.

Paid parental leave: Nick Xenophon warned not to pit working mums against each other, Sydney Morning Herald, 20 November 2016. 

29,038 SIGNATURES

It's hard enough caring for a newborn without being forced back to work early. Please don't cut working parents' right to the existing 18 weeks government paid parental leave. 

Signed,

Fair Agenda will email petition signers from time to time with important updates

* required fields

Latest activity

Emma , 4304  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:53:02 +1000
"not only am i a mother but i speak with many mothers as an accredited professional newborn photographer. These changes will only be to the detriment of our society. Please reconsider your cuts to the paid parental leave program."
Sally , 5213  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:52:52 +1000
"as a mum of two babies with allergies and intolerances the more time I have had to spend with them to get them started in life is for the better….how can taking a mother away from raising her newborn be any good?"
Yolanta , 5151  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:52:52 +1000
"Because I plan on having a baby sometime soon and find this extremely unfair"
Michelle , 4154  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:52:44 +1000
carlie , 3155  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:52:27 +1000
Rebeccah , 4500  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:51:51 +1000
"As an employee of QLD state government I have been fortunate to be able to take 12 months paid leave with each of my girls because of the current PPl entitlements, this formative time in our kids lives makes a difference for the future of our economy and society. Our children deserve this time with their mums and it takes pressure of an already strained childcare system. Not to mention that the government will end up paying the childcare rebate for these kids if mums are forced back to work so I don’t see how it’s saving that much money?"
Jessica , 7173  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:51:44 +1000
Jess , 5072  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:51:38 +1000
"This is an outrageous policy about-face! It completely undermines accepted consensus that 6 months with a primary carer gives the best start in life. Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey clearly have no understanding of the impact this will have on families who cannot afford to take 6 months off work – and, it will only put more pressure on childcare by forcing more families into sending their children to childcare earlier and increasing government spending on childcare rebates for those that do."
Nicki , 2040  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:51:28 +1000
"And a reduction in cost of child care would be welcome too"
Mitchell , 7325  /  signed 2015-05-11 19:51:27 +1000
← Previous  1  2    268  269  270  271  272  273  274  275  276    448  449  Next →