Stop cuts to working parents' time to care

UPDATE - GREAT NEWS: After two years of powerful campaigning by Fair Agenda members and other concerned community members, the cuts to paid parental leave have been taken out of the federal budget. It's a really important reprieve for the tens of thousands of working families who stood to lose precious time to care if these cuts had gone ahead.

But - the fight may not be over. If the Government have shown us anything over the past two years, it's that they don't give up on these cuts easily -- so Fair Agenda will keep a watching brief on this issue.

But right now, Fair Agenda's work to secure an election commitment from the Nick Xenophon Team - and to hold them to account for that promise - are the key factor that are stopping these cuts going ahead. So thank you to all those Fair Agenda members who made calls, sent emails, met with their Senators, helped secure election commitments, and funded research to help stop these cuts. You can read more about the impact of our campaigning together here.

---

The Turnbull Government have just announced their *fourth* attempt to cut our paid parental leave system. They're trying to sell this new proposal as a boost for parents; but in reality they're making a boost for some parents entirely contingent on cutting the time tens of thousands of other working parents can afford to spend caring for their newborns, and planning on stripping $750 million from the system overall.

It's a proposal that would pit working parents against each other, and drag our system backwards. It would also cap the total combined leave available to eligible parents at 20 weeks -- well below the 26 weeks postnatal leave experts recommend for health and welfare outcomes.

The fate of these cuts will be decided by the Senate crossbench, with The Nick Xenophon Team expected to have the critical casting votes. Community campaigning has stopped the Turnbull Government from getting their plans to cut paid parental leave through the previous parliament. 

It's critical we show the Senate crossbench that the community oppose these cuts; and want them to stop these cruel cuts to new families. Can you sign the petition to join the campaign?

Find out more about the new cuts

Experts say that 26 weeks post-natal leave is the minimum needed for health and welfare reasons.

Right now, any eligible parent can access 18 weeks of leave at the minimum wage, and then top that up with any leave they’ve negotiated into their employment contract, to cover costs while they care for their newborn.

The system was designed to be used in combination; to allow more women to access the recommended 26+ weeks leave. For many women, the leave negotiated into their employment agreement has been bargained in lieu of additional pay or other leave provisions. 

In their latest proposal the Government is once again trying to punish these women – by cutting their access to government leave if they want to access the employer leave they’ve negotiated. It means that instead of acting as a floor, the period of government provided leave would instead becomes a ceiling.

To be clear, there are some positive aspects of this latest proposal:

  • The amount of government provided leave would be increased from 18 to 20 weeks at the minimum wage (still well below the 26 weeks recommended by experts). This would be good news for working parents without access to employer leave.
  • A change in the ‘activity test’ that determines would also see an increase in the number of parents eligible to access parental leave. And if these increases were all that was on the table – it would be good news...
  • But both these changes would both be contingent on cutting the leave available for 72,000 other families.  

In short, the crux of this proposal is still a cut. One that’s estimated to tear $600-$750 million out of the parental leave system, and to slash the amount of time thousands of workers like nurses, retail workers and ambos can afford to spend caring for their newborn. In fact, it’s estimated that under this new proposal 68,000 families with a median income of $62,000 a year would lose an average of $5,600.[2]

 

-Find out more -

1. Is this the winning compromise on paid parental leave, Women’s Agenda, 21 November 2016.

2. Samantha Maiden: Breakthrough looms on parental leave pay, Daily Telegraph, 20 November 2016.

Paid parental leave: Nick Xenophon warned not to pit working mums against each other, Sydney Morning Herald, 20 November 2016. 

29,038 SIGNATURES

It's hard enough caring for a newborn without being forced back to work early. Please don't cut working parents' right to the existing 18 weeks government paid parental leave. 

Signed,

Fair Agenda will email petition signers from time to time with important updates

* required fields

Latest activity

Geraldine , 4017  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:55:22 +1100
"Babies are very vulnerable in the first 3months after birth, when their brains are developing. This isthe minimum time needed with their mother. For the future of our country we need to ensure the basic healthy development of babies at at least the minimum level.."
Ann , 2607  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:54:25 +1100
"In late 1961 I began a six week period of paid maternity leave. I was not paid the leave money until I returned to work and had worked (from memory) over 60 days. The leave helped me adjust to the life of a first baby but it was a difficult time financially. The payment to women or thei partners of an income during the time off from work following the birth of the baby is one of the great things that has happened in Australia – don’t tak it away. Ann Gugler"
Paul , 2567  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:52:59 +1100
"Why would we punish the women that help contribute to the economy?"
Kay , 2065  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:50:28 +1100
"This issue is breaking the family’s ability to manage within their budgets as the cost of long day care is $200 per day.
patents both need to work to cover living costs – many of them have no hope of owning of owning their own home
I also implore all governments in Australia to truly understand the average income of a basic job has created the working poor
I suggest that governments also acknowledge older parents are working hard to help their children who cannot find work due to mental health and other disabling issues regarding their health
This means the older parents can’t help the patents of young babies as they have to work to support other Gruen up children whom are struggling with disability, especially fire mental health.
Thank you for attending to this message and seriously allowing a fair go for families
My main point is that it’s not ou young families whom struggle it is also grown up families whom are unable to help their family members with young children
Summary:
Young parents of babies and small children need financial breaks
They don’t have the automatic in family help as their parents are still working
as older workers
Mental health is a major impact on families now and the well family members are working to help their members who cannot work
Therefore the older workers cannot be there to mind the babies and young children
This constitutes the working poor,

Thank you for reading and for considering this imperative matter

Yours faithfully
Kay Healey
North Sydney Council Area"
Natalie , 3752  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:50:14 +1100
Annika , 3975  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:44:41 +1100
Kylie , 2570  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:43:25 +1100
"I’m currently pregnant with my first child due July 19. I will now have to go back to work just to pay for child care for my new born baby. I would be better off not returning to work at all and relying on family tax benefits"
Melissa , 3754  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:41:07 +1100
"I am a full time employed mother of an 18 month old who is hardworking and deserves to be considered and want to stop these cuts."
john , 3030  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:40:06 +1100
"Hello senator Madigan,
Our family has 2 members who are beneficiaries of the PPL scheme. As they are both working mums contributing to the Australian economy and our standard of living it is important that they are supported during their absence from work through thePPL payments and then return to work as efficient contributors to their employers. Please support the current scheme and resist any detrimental changes to this very beneficial scheme.
John Roberts"
Natasha , 4159  /  signed 2016-01-14 08:35:31 +1100
← Previous  1  2  …  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  …  448  449  Next →