Stop cuts to working parents' time to care

UPDATE - GREAT NEWS: After two years of powerful campaigning by Fair Agenda members and other concerned community members, the cuts to paid parental leave have been taken out of the federal budget. It's a really important reprieve for the tens of thousands of working families who stood to lose precious time to care if these cuts had gone ahead.

But - the fight may not be over. If the Government have shown us anything over the past two years, it's that they don't give up on these cuts easily -- so Fair Agenda will keep a watching brief on this issue.

But right now, Fair Agenda's work to secure an election commitment from the Nick Xenophon Team - and to hold them to account for that promise - are the key factor that are stopping these cuts going ahead. So thank you to all those Fair Agenda members who made calls, sent emails, met with their Senators, helped secure election commitments, and funded research to help stop these cuts. You can read more about the impact of our campaigning together here.

---

The Turnbull Government have just announced their *fourth* attempt to cut our paid parental leave system. They're trying to sell this new proposal as a boost for parents; but in reality they're making a boost for some parents entirely contingent on cutting the time tens of thousands of other working parents can afford to spend caring for their newborns, and planning on stripping $750 million from the system overall.

It's a proposal that would pit working parents against each other, and drag our system backwards. It would also cap the total combined leave available to eligible parents at 20 weeks -- well below the 26 weeks postnatal leave experts recommend for health and welfare outcomes.

The fate of these cuts will be decided by the Senate crossbench, with The Nick Xenophon Team expected to have the critical casting votes. Community campaigning has stopped the Turnbull Government from getting their plans to cut paid parental leave through the previous parliament. 

It's critical we show the Senate crossbench that the community oppose these cuts; and want them to stop these cruel cuts to new families. Can you sign the petition to join the campaign?

Find out more about the new cuts

Experts say that 26 weeks post-natal leave is the minimum needed for health and welfare reasons.

Right now, any eligible parent can access 18 weeks of leave at the minimum wage, and then top that up with any leave they’ve negotiated into their employment contract, to cover costs while they care for their newborn.

The system was designed to be used in combination; to allow more women to access the recommended 26+ weeks leave. For many women, the leave negotiated into their employment agreement has been bargained in lieu of additional pay or other leave provisions. 

In their latest proposal the Government is once again trying to punish these women – by cutting their access to government leave if they want to access the employer leave they’ve negotiated. It means that instead of acting as a floor, the period of government provided leave would instead becomes a ceiling.

To be clear, there are some positive aspects of this latest proposal:

  • The amount of government provided leave would be increased from 18 to 20 weeks at the minimum wage (still well below the 26 weeks recommended by experts). This would be good news for working parents without access to employer leave.
  • A change in the ‘activity test’ that determines would also see an increase in the number of parents eligible to access parental leave. And if these increases were all that was on the table – it would be good news...
  • But both these changes would both be contingent on cutting the leave available for 72,000 other families.  

In short, the crux of this proposal is still a cut. One that’s estimated to tear $600-$750 million out of the parental leave system, and to slash the amount of time thousands of workers like nurses, retail workers and ambos can afford to spend caring for their newborn. In fact, it’s estimated that under this new proposal 68,000 families with a median income of $62,000 a year would lose an average of $5,600.[2]

 

-Find out more -

1. Is this the winning compromise on paid parental leave, Women’s Agenda, 21 November 2016.

2. Samantha Maiden: Breakthrough looms on parental leave pay, Daily Telegraph, 20 November 2016.

Paid parental leave: Nick Xenophon warned not to pit working mums against each other, Sydney Morning Herald, 20 November 2016. 

29,038 SIGNATURES

It's hard enough caring for a newborn without being forced back to work early. Please don't cut working parents' right to the existing 18 weeks government paid parental leave. 

Signed,

Fair Agenda will email petition signers from time to time with important updates

* required fields

Latest activity

Janice  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:26:08 +1000
Lily , 6018  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:25:52 +1000
Samantha , 4209  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:24:57 +1000
"I am a “double dipper” – this allowed me more quality time with my second child by taking my employer parental leave at half pay followed by the government one. I didn’t get this the first time around and had to go back to work much earlier, which was not a good thing for my eldest who developed life threatening illnesses at childcare."
Aja , 3185  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:23:57 +1000
"I am committed to my career, but I do need the government’s help to financially sustain myself and my baby in the year that my child needs me most. How can what in total equates to be the pay of a McDonalds employee be considered ‘double dipping’? My work reduced its maternity provision in our last EBA negotiation on the back of 6-months paid maternity leave promised by Tony Abbott in the lead up to the election, and look what happened there! So I have been stung twice, if this budget passes."
Nivek , 4516  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:23:38 +1000
"The paid parental leave is so important to working families out there. Stop making life even more difficult for the disadvantage"
Rebecca , 4350  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:21:51 +1000
"I’d prefer to stay home with my child than have to return to work & pay for childcare!!"
Irit , 3000  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:20:01 +1000
Magdalene , 3195  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:18:05 +1000
"I am a mum and have and am about to again receive the family benefit. Without it I would have had to go back to work within 4 months of having my baby, sleep deprived and missing out on my child’s most critical stage in life. Babies need their mothers – we want to be with them, caring and nurturing them but have the added pressure of such high costs of living that we HAVE to leave them to others to to make sure they still have a hroof above their heads."
Melissa , 2913  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:17:12 +1000
Courtney , 3064  /  signed 2015-05-13 09:16:41 +1000
← Previous  1  2  …  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  …  448  449  Next →