Stop cuts to working parents' time to care

UPDATE - GREAT NEWS: After two years of powerful campaigning by Fair Agenda members and other concerned community members, the cuts to paid parental leave have been taken out of the federal budget. It's a really important reprieve for the tens of thousands of working families who stood to lose precious time to care if these cuts had gone ahead.

But - the fight may not be over. If the Government have shown us anything over the past two years, it's that they don't give up on these cuts easily -- so Fair Agenda will keep a watching brief on this issue.

But right now, Fair Agenda's work to secure an election commitment from the Nick Xenophon Team - and to hold them to account for that promise - are the key factor that are stopping these cuts going ahead. So thank you to all those Fair Agenda members who made calls, sent emails, met with their Senators, helped secure election commitments, and funded research to help stop these cuts. You can read more about the impact of our campaigning together here.

---

The Turnbull Government have just announced their *fourth* attempt to cut our paid parental leave system. They're trying to sell this new proposal as a boost for parents; but in reality they're making a boost for some parents entirely contingent on cutting the time tens of thousands of other working parents can afford to spend caring for their newborns, and planning on stripping $750 million from the system overall.

It's a proposal that would pit working parents against each other, and drag our system backwards. It would also cap the total combined leave available to eligible parents at 20 weeks -- well below the 26 weeks postnatal leave experts recommend for health and welfare outcomes.

The fate of these cuts will be decided by the Senate crossbench, with The Nick Xenophon Team expected to have the critical casting votes. Community campaigning has stopped the Turnbull Government from getting their plans to cut paid parental leave through the previous parliament. 

It's critical we show the Senate crossbench that the community oppose these cuts; and want them to stop these cruel cuts to new families. Can you sign the petition to join the campaign?

Find out more about the new cuts

Experts say that 26 weeks post-natal leave is the minimum needed for health and welfare reasons.

Right now, any eligible parent can access 18 weeks of leave at the minimum wage, and then top that up with any leave they’ve negotiated into their employment contract, to cover costs while they care for their newborn.

The system was designed to be used in combination; to allow more women to access the recommended 26+ weeks leave. For many women, the leave negotiated into their employment agreement has been bargained in lieu of additional pay or other leave provisions. 

In their latest proposal the Government is once again trying to punish these women – by cutting their access to government leave if they want to access the employer leave they’ve negotiated. It means that instead of acting as a floor, the period of government provided leave would instead becomes a ceiling.

To be clear, there are some positive aspects of this latest proposal:

  • The amount of government provided leave would be increased from 18 to 20 weeks at the minimum wage (still well below the 26 weeks recommended by experts). This would be good news for working parents without access to employer leave.
  • A change in the ‘activity test’ that determines would also see an increase in the number of parents eligible to access parental leave. And if these increases were all that was on the table – it would be good news...
  • But both these changes would both be contingent on cutting the leave available for 72,000 other families.  

In short, the crux of this proposal is still a cut. One that’s estimated to tear $600-$750 million out of the parental leave system, and to slash the amount of time thousands of workers like nurses, retail workers and ambos can afford to spend caring for their newborn. In fact, it’s estimated that under this new proposal 68,000 families with a median income of $62,000 a year would lose an average of $5,600.[2]

 

-Find out more -

1. Is this the winning compromise on paid parental leave, Women’s Agenda, 21 November 2016.

2. Samantha Maiden: Breakthrough looms on parental leave pay, Daily Telegraph, 20 November 2016.

Paid parental leave: Nick Xenophon warned not to pit working mums against each other, Sydney Morning Herald, 20 November 2016. 

29,038 SIGNATURES

It's hard enough caring for a newborn without being forced back to work early. Please don't cut working parents' right to the existing 18 weeks government paid parental leave. 

Signed,

Fair Agenda will email petition signers from time to time with important updates

* required fields

Latest activity

Sarah , 2612  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:50:28 +1000
Samantha , 3919  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:50:25 +1000
"My partner & I work extremely hard but still struggle and barely make ends meet. The maternity leave helped us start a family & allowed myself to have 4 solid months off work to care for our newborn. I’m back at work now part time and would love to have another child but not knowing if I will be able to provide for my family during my time off to bring another beautiful human into the world makes me extremely sad. Please think about us hard working mums or mums to be who just want to have some security while we enjoy this special gift of motherhood!!!"
jade , 6164  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:50:03 +1000
"As a new mum it is virtually impossible to think of being forced to leave my little boy to return to work early. The government’s 18 weeks ppl vcombined with my workplace’s maternity leave scheme has allowed me to stay at home and invest in my child. Please don’t take this away opportunity from my future children."
Sarah , 2305  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:47:16 +1000
Stacey , 5155  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:42:58 +1000
Soula , 5085  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:41:51 +1000
Vesna , 3184  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:41:32 +1000
Kristy , 3755  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:40:28 +1000
"Because we have been planning to have another child and are unable to do so if we can’t get both the government and employer paid parental leave. We will have to save for the whole nine months, for me to have 9months off work to care for a new baby. This is a major step backwards and complete contradiction to abbots election promise of 6 months paid leave!"
Lisa , 5453  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:40:19 +1000
"I find it highly offensive that the term ‘double dipping’ has been used in this budget to incite anger in people who chose to believe that this is what women who can access employer and government PPL. Employer paid leave is no different to any other job related ‘perks’ for example cash bonuses, cars for private use, and endless other incentives. It is NOT ok to imply that working, tax paying mothers are ripping off the system."
Melissa , 2232  /  signed 2015-05-13 19:37:47 +1000
"I only had 8 months off when I had my first child because we couldn’t afford to pay our mortgage or live on one wage. My husband is a sole trader and doesn’t have a guaranteed weekly income which pressured me into returning to work early and not spending important quality time with my baby, or mentally preparing myself to return to work. I was sleep deprived and exhausted."
← Previous  1  2  …  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  …  448  449  Next →