Stop cuts to working parents' time to care

UPDATE - GREAT NEWS: After two years of powerful campaigning by Fair Agenda members and other concerned community members, the cuts to paid parental leave have been taken out of the federal budget. It's a really important reprieve for the tens of thousands of working families who stood to lose precious time to care if these cuts had gone ahead.

But - the fight may not be over. If the Government have shown us anything over the past two years, it's that they don't give up on these cuts easily -- so Fair Agenda will keep a watching brief on this issue.

But right now, Fair Agenda's work to secure an election commitment from the Nick Xenophon Team - and to hold them to account for that promise - are the key factor that are stopping these cuts going ahead. So thank you to all those Fair Agenda members who made calls, sent emails, met with their Senators, helped secure election commitments, and funded research to help stop these cuts. You can read more about the impact of our campaigning together here.

---

The Turnbull Government have just announced their *fourth* attempt to cut our paid parental leave system. They're trying to sell this new proposal as a boost for parents; but in reality they're making a boost for some parents entirely contingent on cutting the time tens of thousands of other working parents can afford to spend caring for their newborns, and planning on stripping $750 million from the system overall.

It's a proposal that would pit working parents against each other, and drag our system backwards. It would also cap the total combined leave available to eligible parents at 20 weeks -- well below the 26 weeks postnatal leave experts recommend for health and welfare outcomes.

The fate of these cuts will be decided by the Senate crossbench, with The Nick Xenophon Team expected to have the critical casting votes. Community campaigning has stopped the Turnbull Government from getting their plans to cut paid parental leave through the previous parliament. 

It's critical we show the Senate crossbench that the community oppose these cuts; and want them to stop these cruel cuts to new families. Can you sign the petition to join the campaign?

Find out more about the new cuts

Experts say that 26 weeks post-natal leave is the minimum needed for health and welfare reasons.

Right now, any eligible parent can access 18 weeks of leave at the minimum wage, and then top that up with any leave they’ve negotiated into their employment contract, to cover costs while they care for their newborn.

The system was designed to be used in combination; to allow more women to access the recommended 26+ weeks leave. For many women, the leave negotiated into their employment agreement has been bargained in lieu of additional pay or other leave provisions. 

In their latest proposal the Government is once again trying to punish these women – by cutting their access to government leave if they want to access the employer leave they’ve negotiated. It means that instead of acting as a floor, the period of government provided leave would instead becomes a ceiling.

To be clear, there are some positive aspects of this latest proposal:

  • The amount of government provided leave would be increased from 18 to 20 weeks at the minimum wage (still well below the 26 weeks recommended by experts). This would be good news for working parents without access to employer leave.
  • A change in the ‘activity test’ that determines would also see an increase in the number of parents eligible to access parental leave. And if these increases were all that was on the table – it would be good news...
  • But both these changes would both be contingent on cutting the leave available for 72,000 other families.  

In short, the crux of this proposal is still a cut. One that’s estimated to tear $600-$750 million out of the parental leave system, and to slash the amount of time thousands of workers like nurses, retail workers and ambos can afford to spend caring for their newborn. In fact, it’s estimated that under this new proposal 68,000 families with a median income of $62,000 a year would lose an average of $5,600.[2]

 

-Find out more -

1. Is this the winning compromise on paid parental leave, Women’s Agenda, 21 November 2016.

2. Samantha Maiden: Breakthrough looms on parental leave pay, Daily Telegraph, 20 November 2016.

Paid parental leave: Nick Xenophon warned not to pit working mums against each other, Sydney Morning Herald, 20 November 2016. 

29,038 SIGNATURES

It's hard enough caring for a newborn without being forced back to work early. Please don't cut working parents' right to the existing 18 weeks government paid parental leave. 

Signed,

Fair Agenda will email petition signers from time to time with important updates

* required fields

Latest activity

Vanessa , 5210  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:54:01 +1000
"I am about to take maternity leave later this year and wanted the 18 weeks Govt pay to ensure I got close to 12 months with my new baby. Thanks for announcing this PPL scrapping on Mothers Day, much appreciated. I have paid taxes for over 20 years and never gotten any payments from the Govt until I had my first son. My maternity leave paid by my employer is my business and hard earnt over the last 14 years I have worked."
Courtney , 3019  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:53:53 +1000
"we should be giving extra support to Mothers and their babies, not forcing them to work."
Melissa , 5162  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:53:40 +1000
"i want to be able to spend quality time in my new borns life, and not have to worry about rushing back to work due to these cuts. It’s hard enough without having to stress about this!!!!"
Suzana , 2137  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:53:14 +1000
"Because infants need quality time with their mothers and not strangers"
Jessica , 3429  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:53:10 +1000
Amanda , 3150  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:52:16 +1000
Jen , 2210  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:51:03 +1000
Margaret , 2060  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:50:39 +1000
"The government’s PPL helps mothers stay at home longer with their newborns, which is both good for the newborn and also for the mother’s mental state in not having to go back to work quite so early and worrying about being away from their baby. Which part of this reasoning is “double dipping”?"
Ellanor , 4503  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:49:41 +1000
Jasmine , 5125  /  signed 2015-05-13 21:48:02 +1000
"With cuts to the 18 weeks leave for working parents sadly mothers will have no choice but to put their tiny newborns straight into childcare…this is not fair on the young babies nor the mothers. I am yet to have my first child. Im a full time worker and save my money hard. Living costs have become so extremely expensive i will have no choice but to return to work quickly as my husband (a full time worker) wage will not be able to cover the full mortgage , bills and food each week for me to be able to stay at home. The 18 weeks was my only hope of spending a small amount of time with my newborn before having to return to work. As a full time worker and tax payer receiving no other government funding… i think we have earnt 18 weeks paid parental leave."
← Previous  1  2  …  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  …  448  449  Next →