Education reforms that disadvantage women?

Senators: Stand against education reforms that disadvantage women

CAMPAIGN UPDATE: Fair Agenda members have hand delivered your signatures to key crossbench Senators around the country, showing the community opposes education reforms that would disadvantage women.

Up to $45,000 – that­­’s the amount of extra interest women could end up paying on their degree under the Government’s proposed tertiary education overhaul,[1] a legislation package being negotiated right now.

Researchers have shown that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest will effectively operate as a ‘double whammy’ for many women. First because the gender pay gap extends the time women need to pay off their debt (during which their debt will grow), and then again because any woman who takes time off work to care for children will see their debt grow further in this time.[2]

The cross bench Senators could be expected to vote on these changes as soon as next week. Can you make sure they hear loud and clear that their constituents don’t want education changes that disadvantage women? Sign and share the petition; and local Fair Agenda members will deliver your messages to the Senators' offices this week.

More information

[1] The Abbott Government’s planned de-regulation of uni degrees to hit women the hardest, National Tertiary Education Union, 26 June 2014. Figure based on a three-year accountancy degree, currently costing $30,255, which would climb to about $75,000. The repayments on the degree would grow to $120,000 – including $45,000 in interest, for graduates who take time off to have children and then work part-time. The degree would take 36 years to pay off – compared with 10 years for a typical graduate today. This compares with 23 years for an accountancy graduate who stays in the workforce, who would face repayments of $99,000 - including $24,000 of interest. ‘Women to be hit hardest by student loan debt’, Sydney Morning Herald, 27 May 2014.

[2]HECS upon you: NATSEM models the real impact of higher uni fees, The Conversation, 25 June 2014. ‘Pyne’s education policies hurt women – but the men in cabinet don’t seem to have noticed’, The Guardian, 11 August 2014.

Help us get to 3,500 signatures

3,280 SIGNATURES

Dear Senator,

We're concerned that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest rates have a built-in bias against women. We urge you to oppose this unfair proposal, and any other education reforms that will disproportionately hurt women. 

Signed,

* required fields

Latest activity

Lucy , 2049  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:48:55 +1000
Janet , 2323  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:48:28 +1000
"I have a daughter in Yr 10, looking at studying science at university. I don’t want to see her saddled with a debt that prevents her from ever getting into the housing market, or dependent on a better paid male to put a roof over her head."
Mark , 3016  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:48:23 +1000
Kate , 2101  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:48:19 +1000
Bruce , 3174  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:48:17 +1000
Ross , 2156  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:47:58 +1000
richard , 2030  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:47:52 +1000
john , 2261  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:46:56 +1000
Bernadette , 2484  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:46:41 +1000
Linda , 3056  /  signed 2014-08-21 16:46:40 +1000
"I have 2 children, 18 and 20, one in the middle of uni study, the other finishing Year 12 and hoping to go on to TAFE. It’s not only the fees, that’s bad enough, but there are so many cuts to public funded education I worry about affordability and quality, privatising post-school courses has had some very bad results for quality. We need to value and hold firm to your publci educaiotn system."
← Previous  1  2    22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30    97  98  Next →