Education reforms that disadvantage women?

Senators: Stand against education reforms that disadvantage women

CAMPAIGN UPDATE: Fair Agenda members have hand delivered your signatures to key crossbench Senators around the country, showing the community opposes education reforms that would disadvantage women.

Up to $45,000 – that­­’s the amount of extra interest women could end up paying on their degree under the Government’s proposed tertiary education overhaul,[1] a legislation package being negotiated right now.

Researchers have shown that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest will effectively operate as a ‘double whammy’ for many women. First because the gender pay gap extends the time women need to pay off their debt (during which their debt will grow), and then again because any woman who takes time off work to care for children will see their debt grow further in this time.[2]

The cross bench Senators could be expected to vote on these changes as soon as next week. Can you make sure they hear loud and clear that their constituents don’t want education changes that disadvantage women? Sign and share the petition; and local Fair Agenda members will deliver your messages to the Senators' offices this week.

More information

[1] The Abbott Government’s planned de-regulation of uni degrees to hit women the hardest, National Tertiary Education Union, 26 June 2014. Figure based on a three-year accountancy degree, currently costing $30,255, which would climb to about $75,000. The repayments on the degree would grow to $120,000 – including $45,000 in interest, for graduates who take time off to have children and then work part-time. The degree would take 36 years to pay off – compared with 10 years for a typical graduate today. This compares with 23 years for an accountancy graduate who stays in the workforce, who would face repayments of $99,000 - including $24,000 of interest. ‘Women to be hit hardest by student loan debt’, Sydney Morning Herald, 27 May 2014.

[2]HECS upon you: NATSEM models the real impact of higher uni fees, The Conversation, 25 June 2014. ‘Pyne’s education policies hurt women – but the men in cabinet don’t seem to have noticed’, The Guardian, 11 August 2014.

Help us get to 3,500 signatures

3,280 SIGNATURES

Dear Senator,

We're concerned that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest rates have a built-in bias against women. We urge you to oppose this unfair proposal, and any other education reforms that will disproportionately hurt women. 

Signed,

* required fields

Latest activity

Janet , 2482  /  signed 2014-08-21 20:13:15 +1000
"These proposed changes will impact our family, with one daughter still at university. It is such an inequitable proposal and will anger all women in our society."
Mirabelle , 2065  /  signed 2014-08-21 20:11:11 +1000
Eleisha , 3058  /  signed 2014-08-21 20:09:30 +1000
"I am the mother of one daughter and another on the way. Even if they don’t go into female dominated sectors where the pay is less than in other professions they may choose to have children and take time out of work or scale back and reduce there income at some point in their career and all this means is that they will take longer and longer and be penalised by this harsh system for not paying back their education debts. This is an unfair system for women generally and we make up half the population so we should not stand for it."
Katie , 2011  /  signed 2014-08-21 20:07:08 +1000
"Like much of the 2014 budget there are too many unfair biases and pressures on people who should not carry a greater burden. As a woman with 2 degrees and a mother of a young daughter I am furious to think she, I, and other women will be penalised in our society for contributing in substantial ways."
Marie , 3892  /  signed 2014-08-21 20:07:02 +1000
Grace , 5028  /  signed 2014-08-21 20:02:32 +1000
Trish , 7304  /  signed 2014-08-21 20:01:27 +1000
Miriam , 2071  /  signed 2014-08-21 20:00:59 +1000
"There is no equal opportunity in this country when female workers have conditions which limit them compared to their male compatriots, who nonetheless benefit from having them as mothers of their children. Both genders should share the financial burden of having children equally, but these changes are going to make females carry even more."
Sandra , 3030  /  signed 2014-08-21 20:00:50 +1000
Victoria , 2048  /  signed 2014-08-21 19:58:38 +1000
← Previous  1  2    15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23    97  98  Next →