Education reforms that disadvantage women?

Senators: Stand against education reforms that disadvantage women

CAMPAIGN UPDATE: Fair Agenda members have hand delivered your signatures to key crossbench Senators around the country, showing the community opposes education reforms that would disadvantage women.

Up to $45,000 – that­­’s the amount of extra interest women could end up paying on their degree under the Government’s proposed tertiary education overhaul,[1] a legislation package being negotiated right now.

Researchers have shown that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest will effectively operate as a ‘double whammy’ for many women. First because the gender pay gap extends the time women need to pay off their debt (during which their debt will grow), and then again because any woman who takes time off work to care for children will see their debt grow further in this time.[2]

The cross bench Senators could be expected to vote on these changes as soon as next week. Can you make sure they hear loud and clear that their constituents don’t want education changes that disadvantage women? Sign and share the petition; and local Fair Agenda members will deliver your messages to the Senators' offices this week.

More information

[1] The Abbott Government’s planned de-regulation of uni degrees to hit women the hardest, National Tertiary Education Union, 26 June 2014. Figure based on a three-year accountancy degree, currently costing $30,255, which would climb to about $75,000. The repayments on the degree would grow to $120,000 – including $45,000 in interest, for graduates who take time off to have children and then work part-time. The degree would take 36 years to pay off – compared with 10 years for a typical graduate today. This compares with 23 years for an accountancy graduate who stays in the workforce, who would face repayments of $99,000 - including $24,000 of interest. ‘Women to be hit hardest by student loan debt’, Sydney Morning Herald, 27 May 2014.

[2]HECS upon you: NATSEM models the real impact of higher uni fees, The Conversation, 25 June 2014. ‘Pyne’s education policies hurt women – but the men in cabinet don’t seem to have noticed’, The Guardian, 11 August 2014.

Help us get to 3,500 signatures

3,280 SIGNATURES

Dear Senator,

We're concerned that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest rates have a built-in bias against women. We urge you to oppose this unfair proposal, and any other education reforms that will disproportionately hurt women. 

Signed,

* required fields

Latest activity

Yvette , 3072  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:13:40 +1000
"I am concerned that these changes will disproportionately affect women due to our different working patterns across the life course and the gender pay gap – which was reported today to be at a 20-year high."
Jenny , 3691  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:13:38 +1000
Fiona , 3030  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:13:38 +1000
Emma , 5170  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:13:14 +1000
Dimity , 2640  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:12:34 +1000
"I have 8 nieces under 18 and a daughter, 3. At least some of them will attend university. I do not want them to grow up in an Australia that will limit their options – educationally, professionally or personally. This legislation will limit the next generation’s opportunities. Can we allow this to happen when our own opportunities have been so great?"
Rosalind , 3977  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:12:24 +1000
Brando , 3500  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:12:11 +1000
Irene , 3072  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:10:48 +1000
Verity , 5063  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:09:49 +1000
"I have 2 daughters, one of whom is at Uni, and one in high school. Crippling them with ongoing debts with interest, is iniquitous."
Ande , 3068  /  signed 2014-08-15 13:08:07 +1000
"My daughter is about to enter university – hoping to study medicine. This may cost her $200,000 in fees and the interest proposed would mean a lifetime of debt for her"
← Previous  1  2    72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80    97  98  Next →