Education reforms that disadvantage women?

Senators: Stand against education reforms that disadvantage women

CAMPAIGN UPDATE: Fair Agenda members have hand delivered your signatures to key crossbench Senators around the country, showing the community opposes education reforms that would disadvantage women.

Up to $45,000 – that­­’s the amount of extra interest women could end up paying on their degree under the Government’s proposed tertiary education overhaul,[1] a legislation package being negotiated right now.

Researchers have shown that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest will effectively operate as a ‘double whammy’ for many women. First because the gender pay gap extends the time women need to pay off their debt (during which their debt will grow), and then again because any woman who takes time off work to care for children will see their debt grow further in this time.[2]

The cross bench Senators could be expected to vote on these changes as soon as next week. Can you make sure they hear loud and clear that their constituents don’t want education changes that disadvantage women? Sign and share the petition; and local Fair Agenda members will deliver your messages to the Senators' offices this week.

More information

[1] The Abbott Government’s planned de-regulation of uni degrees to hit women the hardest, National Tertiary Education Union, 26 June 2014. Figure based on a three-year accountancy degree, currently costing $30,255, which would climb to about $75,000. The repayments on the degree would grow to $120,000 – including $45,000 in interest, for graduates who take time off to have children and then work part-time. The degree would take 36 years to pay off – compared with 10 years for a typical graduate today. This compares with 23 years for an accountancy graduate who stays in the workforce, who would face repayments of $99,000 - including $24,000 of interest. ‘Women to be hit hardest by student loan debt’, Sydney Morning Herald, 27 May 2014.

[2]HECS upon you: NATSEM models the real impact of higher uni fees, The Conversation, 25 June 2014. ‘Pyne’s education policies hurt women – but the men in cabinet don’t seem to have noticed’, The Guardian, 11 August 2014.

Help us get to 3,500 signatures

3,280 SIGNATURES

Dear Senator,

We're concerned that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest rates have a built-in bias against women. We urge you to oppose this unfair proposal, and any other education reforms that will disproportionately hurt women. 

Signed,

* required fields

Latest activity

Carolyn , 3018  /  signed 2014-08-16 10:19:17 +1000
Sarah , 2262  /  signed 2014-08-16 10:18:00 +1000
"I am a mother of 3 trying to complete a B.Education so that I can eventually earn an income that will allow us to buy a house rather than rent. These changes will see more of my potential income slip away from helping us reach our dream.
Two of my children are girls. I want them to grow up and have choices. I want a University education to be one of those options for them. The idea of working simply to pay off that debt and never earning a decent living should not be a factor in their decision making. "
Karen , 3856  /  signed 2014-08-16 10:14:56 +1000
"A country of people who are not encouraged to educate themselves equals a dumb country that cannot thrive. Please do not allow these changes to go through to our education system. We need to encourage people to increase their wealth of knowledge, empower the community and create strong minds and a strong, fair and equal Australia. Please do not make it more difficult for women to move forward in life and in Australia."
Lynne , 3099  /  signed 2014-08-16 10:08:04 +1000
Margot , 3088  /  signed 2014-08-16 10:06:53 +1000
"It’s unfair that some women will have a greater debt component to the cost of their degree if they are not able to pay the loan as quickly as those with greater income and more continuous workplace experience"
Madeleine , 3074  /  signed 2014-08-16 10:04:23 +1000
Christine , 3222  /  signed 2014-08-16 09:52:06 +1000
"For a better and stronger society we need to encourage education not discourage. This policy would certainly discourage people from furthering their education particularly the more disadvantaged in society."
Tom , 3039  /  signed 2014-08-16 09:48:37 +1000
Leah , 2431  /  signed 2014-08-16 09:36:21 +1000
"I am currently studying a BA in Archaeology as a distance student. I just manage to fit study in between family, work and everything else I have going on. I love it, and I am hoping to one day support my family with my degree. If the proposed changes go ahead, I will not be able to afford to complete my degree."
Margaret , 3134  /  signed 2014-08-16 09:35:30 +1000
"I have 3 grandchildren who have started their University course or are in the last few years of school. I am concerned that they will be starting out in their 20s with huge debt, just at a time when they should be able to save for a reliable car, get married, in a few years start a family, and get at mortgage tp buy a house. If my granddaughter, or the partners of my grandsons, want to take some time out of the workforce, or work part-time, to look after children those debts will be getting bigger and bigger. At that time in my life, I left university with no debts, and my children had only small debts, which only increased with inflation.; but for my grandchildren these proposed changes – they are NOT reforms – may well ‘hang’ over them for most of their lives."
← Previous  1  2    61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69    97  98  Next →