Education reforms that disadvantage women?

Senators: Stand against education reforms that disadvantage women

CAMPAIGN UPDATE: Fair Agenda members have hand delivered your signatures to key crossbench Senators around the country, showing the community opposes education reforms that would disadvantage women.

Up to $45,000 – that­­’s the amount of extra interest women could end up paying on their degree under the Government’s proposed tertiary education overhaul,[1] a legislation package being negotiated right now.

Researchers have shown that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest will effectively operate as a ‘double whammy’ for many women. First because the gender pay gap extends the time women need to pay off their debt (during which their debt will grow), and then again because any woman who takes time off work to care for children will see their debt grow further in this time.[2]

The cross bench Senators could be expected to vote on these changes as soon as next week. Can you make sure they hear loud and clear that their constituents don’t want education changes that disadvantage women? Sign and share the petition; and local Fair Agenda members will deliver your messages to the Senators' offices this week.

More information

[1] The Abbott Government’s planned de-regulation of uni degrees to hit women the hardest, National Tertiary Education Union, 26 June 2014. Figure based on a three-year accountancy degree, currently costing $30,255, which would climb to about $75,000. The repayments on the degree would grow to $120,000 – including $45,000 in interest, for graduates who take time off to have children and then work part-time. The degree would take 36 years to pay off – compared with 10 years for a typical graduate today. This compares with 23 years for an accountancy graduate who stays in the workforce, who would face repayments of $99,000 - including $24,000 of interest. ‘Women to be hit hardest by student loan debt’, Sydney Morning Herald, 27 May 2014.

[2]HECS upon you: NATSEM models the real impact of higher uni fees, The Conversation, 25 June 2014. ‘Pyne’s education policies hurt women – but the men in cabinet don’t seem to have noticed’, The Guardian, 11 August 2014.

Help us get to 3,500 signatures

3,280 SIGNATURES

Dear Senator,

We're concerned that the Government's proposed changes to university loan interest rates have a built-in bias against women. We urge you to oppose this unfair proposal, and any other education reforms that will disproportionately hurt women. 

Signed,

* required fields

Latest activity

Elisabeth , 3182  /  signed 2014-08-18 10:20:50 +1000
Nat , 3147  /  signed 2014-08-18 10:02:06 +1000
"If I choose to have children I want them to have the best opportunities possible. Don’t stop us from shaping our leaders of tomorrow by hindering us with cumbersome debts today. "
Elizabeth , 3070  /  signed 2014-08-18 09:53:10 +1000
Margaret , 3195  /  signed 2014-08-18 09:50:14 +1000
Anthony , 5291  /  signed 2014-08-18 09:37:42 +1000
"To support these changes is very unfair to Women. They have enough to contend with within the jobs market, why make it even harder for women to get into a job which will give financial security to their family? There is nothing wrong with being a Life Giver and a Bred Winner! "
Alexandra , 3000  /  signed 2014-08-18 09:37:00 +1000
Rosy , 3052  /  signed 2014-08-18 09:27:59 +1000
"We’re not wealthy a family and we work hard to send our children to school and university. The proposed changes could potentially keep my children out of reach from the course they want to study."
Luisa , 3084  /  signed 2014-08-18 09:27:08 +1000
Candice , 2088  /  signed 2014-08-18 09:19:55 +1000
Olivia , 2121  /  signed 2014-08-18 09:14:27 +1000
"I firmly believe that an educated society is a progressive one, and better equipped to become active and engaged within the wider global political sphere. These reforms will deter the economically disadvantaged from pursuing higher education, lowering the overall educative level of our country. Furthermore, it will deprive Australia of much of its potential while simultaneously reinforcing a deeply misogynistic and heterogeneous attitude within broader culture. Every person should have a right to higher education regardless of their socio-economic status, and doing so can only benefit Australia in the future. To agree to these reforms is to agree to an unfair and backwards social policy. "
← Previous  1  2    56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64    97  98  Next →